Showing posts with label Raymond Carver. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Raymond Carver. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

microcosmic

Hot on the heels of Alice Munro's Nobel Prize for Literature comes the news that Lynn Coady has won the Giller for her collection of short stories, Hellgoing.
     Could this be a sign that the short story has once again claimed its rightful place in the firmament of literary respectability?
     Collections of short stories are notorious hard to get published, but maybe a new generation's love affair with e-books and all things digital will kindle a revival of interest in this often overlooked art form.
     Here's an article by Thom Grier of Entertainment Weekly about book trailers that might bode well for the future of the short story.


"Cheever and Updike were my literary parents; the vistas they described—the 1960s and 1970s, the shaken cocktails, the urgent bad sex, the smoky, Nixonian America—amplified my own narrow vision. Casting further back, Hemingway and Fitzgerald represented (impossible to imagine this now) literary polar opposites—bullfights and Africa! Martinis and money!
     Drawn to decadence in every form, I also wanted to read writing that might erase boundaries of generation, gender, race and class, and show how one might live more fully in the great body of humanity. I discovered American champions of working class experience--Tillie Olsen, Grace Paley, Raymond Carver--then Tolstoy, Chekhov, Babel, Kafka, and Borges. I’m still regularly blown open by the wildly different effects writers achieve using the somewhat limited range of 
human experience, language and consciousness.
      The following 10 collections—whole atmospheres made entirely of words—feel essential, either because they manage to make human experience feel new, or because, like some uncle who left a $1,000,000 legacy, their influence lingers. [...]"
— Carolyn Cooke, Publishers Weekly
Read more…

Buy books by all the authors mentioned in this post here...

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

“[...] let the soda crackers be soda crackers” [which] “are mysterious enough as it is.” — Saul Bellow


For the nineteenth time in nineteen years, the Nobel Prize in Literature has gone to a writer outside of the US. As with most people in this country, the members of Still Eating Oranges were previously unfamiliar with the work of Chinese author Mo Yan. If he is as talented as last year’s winner, Tomas Tranströmer, then we have reason to be excited. As usual, though, a certain group (comprised mostly of Americans) has come out to criticize the Nobel committee for snubbing Cormac McCarthy or Joyce Carol Oates or Philip Roth. Those familiar with this annual tradition will remember that Roth, in particular, has become the cause célèbre for angry American pundits. The US has not had a laureate since Toni Morrison, the logic goes; and so there must be bias afoot. […]
     A certain literary culture dominates contemporary American schools and publications. In the past, we have considered a few of the effects—brutish, ironic and conflict-based stories—of this establishment. Its heroes and models are the world’s Roths, Raymond Carvers, John Updikes and Jonathan Franzens; its laws are 'subtext over surface,' 'sincerity kills' and 'realism trumps exaggeration.' It began to take off in and around the 1950s, popularized by the writing of Norman Mailer, Roth and others. It took root irrevocably in the following decades. This coincided with the rise of ever-more-unavoidable, ever-more-strict MFA programs and writers’ workshops, which indoctrinated at least two generations of writers into the same mentality.
     Today, peer pressure, school curricula, editorial taste and online writing guides ensure that new American writers all feed from the same trough."
still eating oranges
Read more…